Med Phys Slam Rules
Who is eligible?
You must be a current Associate or Associate-Student member of AAPM (undergraduate or graduate student, resident, postdoc, MPA, or clinical engineer). Your presentation must be based on your own, original research.
Presentation Format :
Visuals
Summary
MedPhys Slam is a research communication competition in which participants prepare a three-minute presentation aimed at sharing the significance of their science in a compelling yet understandable manner. Researchers spend day in and day out investigating the minutia of their topics, yet, to market a product or themselves, the minutia must be understood by more than just the scientific community. It’s all in the art of communication, and this is what MedPhys Slam aims to foster in the medical physics community. This competition is open to all students and trainees. The preliminary competitions will take place at the local chapter meetings throughout the year, and those winners will participate in the final competition at the AAPM annual meetings. The rules are simple: participants have three minutes to present their research using a maximum of three PowerPoint slides. Participants will be judged on three equally weighted categories: comprehension/content, communication, and engagement. Not only will this be of interest to those within medical physics, it can be expanded as a AAPM media initiative aimed at communicating what we do to the public. Presentations will be recorded and posted on social media outlets like FaceBook and a dedicated YouTube Channel.
Structure
Each AAPM Regional/Local Chapter (and one International category) holds a similar competition to select a single winner to represent the chapter at the AAPM annual meeting.
STSC organizes a final event for the Chapter champions to be held at the AAPM meetings.
How is this different than YIS?
The purpose of the MedPhys Slam is entirely different than YIS. The audience for our event is not medical physicists; it is a general audience that may have no background knowledge of the field. Presenters have 3 minutes to give the “what, how, and why” of their research and convince a panel of judges that their work is impactful and important.
How is this different than YIS?
The purpose of the MedPhys Slam is entirely different than YIS. The audience for our event is not medical physicists; it is a general audience that may have no background knowledge of the field. Presenters have 3 minutes to give the “what, how, and why” of their research and convince a panel of judges that their work is impactful and important.
Typical judges include:
Patient advocate/cancer survivor
Benefits of this event
For the students/trainees who participate, this event will provide an opportunity to practice and develop skills in communicating their research to a public audience. This is an opportunity that is relatively rare for researchers who most often present and publish their work targeted toward an audience of their scientific peers.
For AAPM, this event will allow for the recording and producing of videos of high-quality speakers presenting current research in a way that is ready for a public audience. The videos can be shared to a wide audience and will help spread the word about exciting research in our field. Additionally, depending on who is invited as a judge, there is a potential to provide good visibility of our field and annual meeting to the local community.
The same benefits can be scaled to the AAPM Chapters for their local events. The ideal chapter would provide mentorship, guidance, and funding support to their participant. The chapter members can then rally behind “their” representative in the final competition.
Prior to competing in the NWAAPM Chapter Meeting, please watch these example Slam Presentations from the National AAPM Competion:
2018 MedPhys Slam: https://www.aapm.org/education/VL/vl.asp?id=12790, https://www.aapm.org/education/VL/default.asp?t=byE&e=AM&y=2018
Scoring
Comprehension/Content (out of 10):
Did the presentation follow a logical sequence?
Communication (out of 10):
Did the slides enhance, rather than detract from, the presentation; was it clear, legible, and concise?
Engagement (out of 10):
- Did the presentation make the audience want to know more?
- Was the presenter careful not to trivialize or 'dumb down' the research?
- Did the presenter convey enthusiasm for the research?
- Did the presenter capture and maintain their audience's attention?
- Would the audience want to know more about the speaker's research?
Prizes: